1. What were your concerns about in an SQR? What would you like the group to consider, respond to, or evaluate on an SQR of yours?
In my SQR I took care about the grammar content, the expression of my ideas, to give enough details, and try to post whatever the writer means. And the peer revision is very helpful at the time of my revision, I like to have all points of view evaluated by them. Once a friend told me that I wrote too much in a SQR and I haven’t see it until he told me, and I could do a better job.
2. How did you see/evaluate the comments you made on your peers’ papers? Honestly, do you think they were really helpful? (It’s ok that you can say no. If that’s the case, please state what made you unable to provide specific comments as you wished. It’s important for me to know how carefully you read your peers’ papers and how did you work on commenting your friends’ papers).
Actually, at the beginning my comments weren’t good, I tried to be nice. I comment things like “ good job” , “nice explanation” my comment weren’t really useful. Then after the 2nd lecture I improve my comments and made myself more critical using constructive criticism.
No comments:
Post a Comment